4.7 Article

Mitochondria mediate septin cage assembly to promote autophagy of Shigella

期刊

EMBO REPORTS
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 1029-1043

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201541832

关键词

autophagy; cytoskeleton; mitochondria; septin; Shigella

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/K015826/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M022374/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellowship [WT097411MA]
  4. Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
  5. BBSRC [BB/M022374/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/K015826/1, MR/J006874/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M022374/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/K015826/1, MR/J006874/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Foundation [C0483] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. The Francis Crick Institute [10209] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Septins, cytoskeletal proteins with well-characterised roles in cytokinesis, form cage-like structures around cytosolic Shigella flexneri and promote their targeting to autophagosomes. However, the processes underlying septin cage assembly, and whether they influence S. flexneri proliferation, remain to be established. Using single-cell analysis, we show that the septin cages inhibit S. flexneri proliferation. To study mechanisms of septin cage assembly, we used proteomics and found mitochondrial proteins associate with septins in S. flexneri-infected cells. Strikingly, mitochondria associated with S. flexneri promote septin assembly into cages that entrap bacteria for autophagy. We demonstrate that the cytosolic GTPase dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) interacts with septins to enhance mitochondrial fission. To avoid autophagy, actin-polymerising Shigella fragment mitochondria to escape from septin caging. Our results demonstrate a role for mitochondria in anti-Shigella autophagy and uncover a fundamental link between septin assembly andmitochondria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据