4.7 Review

Exosomes and exosomal microRNA in non-targeted radiation bystander and abscopal effects in the central nervous system

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 499, 期 -, 页码 73-84

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.10.049

关键词

Non-targeted radiation effects; CNS; Exosomes; Exosomal microRNAs; Akt pathway

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1532264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Localized cranial radiotherapy is a key treatment for brain cancers, causing targeted and non-targeted radiation effects in the central nervous system. MicroRNAs play a crucial role in regulating these effects, making them promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CNS radiation-induced effects.
Localized cranial radiotherapy is a dominant treatment for brain cancers. After being subjected to radiation, the central nervous system (CNS) exhibits targeted effects as well as non-targeted radiation bystander effects (RIBE) and abscopal effects (RIAE). Radiation-induced targeted effects in the CNS include autophagy and various changes in tumor cells due to radiation sensitivity, which can be regulated by microRNAs. Non-targeted radiation effects are mainly induced by gap junctional communication between cells, exosomes containing microRNAs can be transduced by intracellular endocytosis to regulate RIBE and RIAE. In this review, we discuss the involvement of microRNAs in radiation-induced targeted effects, as well as exosomes and/or exosomal microRNAs in non-targeted radiation effects in the CNS. As a target pathway, we also discuss the Akt pathway which is regulated by microRNAs, exosomes, and/or exosomal microRNAs in radiation-induced targeted effects and RIBE in CNS tumor cells. As the CNS-derived exosomes can cross the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) into the bloodstream and be isolated from peripheral blood, exosomes and exosomal microRNAs can emerge as promising minimally invasive biomarkers and therapeutic targets for radiation-induced targeted and non-targeted effects in the CNS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据