4.7 Article

Immune-related adverse events: promising predictors for efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 70, 期 9, 页码 2559-2576

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02803-5

关键词

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs); Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); Efficacy

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2019J01457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that irAEs triggered by ICIs, especially in the skin, endocrine organs, or gastrointestinal tract, can predict significant survival benefits for patients.
Purpose This study was designed to investigate the correlation between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and corresponding efficacy, and to explore the potential of predicting the efficacy of ICIs via irAEs. Methods Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang were applied to search for relevant studies. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Stratification analyses were conducted according to the type of irAEs and ICIs, region of studies and primary tumors. Furthermore, statistical analyses were realized by means of RevMan 5.3 software. Results Altogether, 40 studies with 8,641 participants were enrolled, among which the incidence of irAEs ranged from 15.34 to 85.23% and the major sites reached out to skin, endocrine organ, gastrointestinal tract, liver and lung. The ORR, OS and PFS in irAE group were significantly higher than those in non-irAE group as per pooled analyses and stratification analyses. Importantly, patients with irAEs in skin, endocrine organ or gastrointestinal tract rather than in liver and lung were found to obtain survival benefits (p < 0.05). Conclusion IrAEs, especially in skin, endocrine organ or gastrointestinal tract, triggered by ICIs indicate significant survival benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据