4.5 Article

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography in Singapore: A Modeling Study

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 653-660

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1230

关键词

-

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Health, Health Services Research Competitive Research Grant [HSRG/13MAY006]
  2. NCI as part of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) [U01 CA199218]
  3. National Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist Award [NMRC/CSA-SI/0015/2017]
  4. National University Cancer Institute Singapore Centre Grant Programme [CGAug16M005]
  5. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health Programme of Research Seed Funding (SSHSPHRes-Prog)
  6. Asian Breast Cancer Research Fund [N-176-000-023-091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current breast cancer screening program in Singapore is cost-effective and near the efficiency frontier, with starting screening at age 40 or 45 being recommended for optimal cost-effectiveness. Increasing screening attendance rates can further enhance benefits while maintaining cost-effectiveness.
Background: Limited research is available on the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening programs in Asian countries. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of Singapore's national mammography screening program, implemented in 2002, recommending annual screening between ages 40 and 49 and biennial screening between ages 50 and 69, and alternative screening scenarios taking into account important country-specific factors. Methods: We used national data from Singapore in the MIcro-simulation SCreening ANalysis-Fatal diameter (MISCAN-Fadia) model to simulate 302 screening scenarios for 10 million women born between 1910 and 1969. Screening scenarios varied by starting and ending age, screening interval, and attendance. Outcome measures included life-years gained (LYG), breast cancer deaths averted, false positives, overdiagnosis, qualityadjusted life years (QALY), costs (in 2002 Singapore dollars; S$), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Costs and effects were calculated and discounted with 3% using a health care provider's perspective. Results: Singapore's current screening program at observed attendance levels required 54,158 mammograms per 100,000 women, yielded 1,054 LYG, and averted 57 breast cancer deaths. At attendance rates >= 50%, the current program was near the efficiency frontier. Most scenarios on the efficiency frontier started screening at age 40. The ICERs of the scenarios on the efficiency frontiers ranged between S$10,186 and S$56,306/QALY, which is considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of S$70,000/QALY gained. Conclusions: Singapore's current screening program lies near the efficiency frontier, and starting screening at age 40 or 45 is costeffective. Furthermore, enhancing screening attendance rates would increase benefits while maintaining cost-effectiveness. Impact: Screening all women at age 40 or 45 is cost-efficient in Singapore, and a policy change may be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据