4.7 Article

M2 macrophages-derived exosomal microRNA-501-3p promotes the progression of lung cancer via targeting WD repeat domain 82

期刊

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-01783-5

关键词

Lung cancer; M2 macrophages-derived exosome; MicroRNA-501-3p; WD repeat domain 82

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research suggests that exosomal miR-501-3p derived from M2 macrophages promotes the progression of lung cancer (LC) by downregulating WDR82. This study provides important insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of LC.
Background Exosomes are known to transmit microRNAs (miRNAs) to affect cancer progression, while the role of M2 macrophages-derived exosomes (M2 exosomes) conveying miR-501-3p in lung cancer (LC) remains unknown. We aim to explore the role of exosomal miR-501-3p in LC development via targeting WD repeat domain 82 (WDR82). Methods Lung cancer tissue and normal tissue specimens were collected, in which tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) were measured by immunohistochemistry. M2 macrophages were induced and treated with altered miR-501-3p, and then the exosomes were extracted and identified. MiR-501-3p and WDR82 expression in LC tissues and cell liens was determined. The predictive role of miR-501-3p in prognosis of LC patients was assessed, and the proliferation, colony formation ability, invasion, migration and apoptosis of the LC cells were determined. Targeting relationship between miR-501-3p and WDR82 was confirmed. Results TAM level was elevated in lung cancer tissues. MiR-501-3p was upregulated while WDR82 was downregulated in LC tissues and cell lines, and the M2 exosomes further upregulated miR-501-3p. M2 exosomes and exosomal miR-501-3p promoted LC cell growth. MiR-501-3p inhibition reversed the effect of M2 exosomes on LC cells. WDR82 was confirmed as a target gene of miR-501-3p. Conclusion M2 macrophages-derived exosomal miR-501-3p promotes the progression of LC via downregulating WDR82.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据