4.7 Article

Niacin-mediated Tace activation ameliorates CMT neuropathies with focal hypermyelination

期刊

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 1438-1454

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201606349

关键词

animal models; Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathies; myelin; Neuregulin 1; nicotinic acid

资金

  1. Telethon-Italy [GPP10007D, GGP12017, GGP15012A, GPP10007, GGP15012, GGP12024, GPP10007B, GGP15012B]
  2. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)-France [16040, 16922]
  3. ERA-Net for Research Programmes on Rare Diseases
  4. AFM-France [15-18518]
  5. Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2011-02347127]
  6. San Raffaele International Postdoctoral Programme [PCOFUND-GA-2010-267264 INVEST]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) neuropathies are highly heterogeneous disorders caused by mutations in more than 70 genes, with no available treatment. Thus, it is difficult to envisage a single suitable treatment for all pathogenetic mechanisms. Axonal Neuregulin 1 (Nrg1) type III drives Schwann cell myelination and determines myelin thickness by ErbB2/B3-PI3K-Akt signaling pathway activation. Nrg1 type III is inhibited by the -secretase Tace, which negatively regulates PNS myelination. We hypothesized that modulation of Nrg1 levels and/or secretase activity may constitute a unifying treatment strategy for CMT neuropathies with focal hypermyelination as it could restore normal levels of myelination. Here we show that invivo delivery of Niaspan, a FDA-approved drug known to enhance TACE activity, efficiently rescues myelination in the Mtmr2(-/-) mouse, a model of CMT4B1 with myelin outfoldings, and in the Pmp22(+/-) mouse, which reproduces HNPP (hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies) with tomacula. Importantly, we also found that Niaspan reduces hypermyelination of Vim (vimentin)(-/-) mice, characterized by increased Nrg1 type III and Akt activation, thus corroborating the hypothesis that Niaspan treatment downregulates Nrg1 type III signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据