4.4 Article

Tissue engineering and regenerative therapeutics: The nexus of chemical engineering and translational medicine

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 99, 期 10, 页码 2069-2086

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.24094

关键词

biomaterials; bioreactors; cell delivery; rheology; tissue engineering

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have advanced significantly over the past 30 years, with key modules including cells, biodegradable scaffolds, bioreactors, and biomolecules. These fields involve various disciplines such as biological sciences, chemical engineering, materials chemistry, and polymer processing, requiring a deep understanding of viscous fluid flow, mass transfer, and reaction engineering.
Since its emergence nearly 30 years ago with the goal of fabricating replacement human tissues or assisting the body in repairing itself, several advances have been made in the fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The assembly of living cells into tissues is akin to the scale-up operation of a chemical or biochemical process with several modules or units affecting the final product. The major modules or units in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine are cells, biodegradable scaffolds, bioreactors, and biomolecules. Each module is analogous to unit operations, where individual units must come together to successfully design engineered tissues for therapeutic and drug discovery applications. Basic principles of biological sciences, chemical engineering, materials chemistry, and polymer processing are frequently employed. More specifically, knowledge about viscous fluid flow, mass transfer, and reaction engineering is essential in tissue engineering. In this review article, we present the nexus between chemical engineering and tissue engineering for the rational design of engineered tissues or injectable cell-laden hydrogel systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据