4.7 Article

Modified Atkins diet induces subacute selective ragged-red-fiber lysis in mitochondrial myopathypatients

期刊

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 1234-1247

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201606592

关键词

mitochondrial myopathy; modified Atkins diet; PEO; ragged-red-fibers

资金

  1. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  2. Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation
  3. European Research Council
  4. Academy of Finland
  5. University of Helsinki
  6. Helsinki University Central Hospital
  7. Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation
  8. Helsinki Biomedical Graduate School, University of Helsinki
  9. Waldemar von Frenckells stiftelse
  10. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  11. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  12. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10OC1013354] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial myopathy (MM) with progressive external ophthalmoplegia (PEO) is a common manifestation of mitochondrial disease in adulthood, for which there is no curative therapy. In mice with MM, ketogenic diet significantly delayed progression of the disease. We asked in this pilot study what effects high-fat, low-carbohydrate modified Atkins diet (mAD) had for PEO/MM patients and control subjects and followed up the effects by clinical, morphological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses. All of our five patients, irrespective of genotype, showed a subacute response after 1.5-2weeks of diet, with progressive muscle pain and leakage of muscle enzymes, leading to premature discontinuation of the diet. Analysis of muscle ultrastructure revealed selective fiber damage, especially in the ragged-red-fibers (RRFs), a MM hallmark. Two years of follow-up showed improvement of muscle strength, suggesting activation of muscle regeneration. Our results indicate that (i) nutrition can modify mitochondrial disease progression, (ii) dietary counseling should be part of MM care, (iii) short mAD is a tool to induce targeted RRF lysis, and (iv) mAD, a common weight-loss method, may induce muscle damage in a population subgroup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据