4.8 Article

p38γ and p38δ reprogram liver metabolism by modulating neutrophil infiltration

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 536-552

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201591857

关键词

diabetes; inflammation; obesity; steatosis; stress kinases

资金

  1. FPI Severo Ochoa CNIC Program [SVP-2013-067639]
  2. CNIC IPP FP7 Marie Curie Programme [PCOFUND-2012-600396]
  3. Madrid Regional Government Fellowship
  4. ERC [260464]
  5. EFSD [2030]
  6. MICINN [SAF2010-19347, BFU2012-35255, SAF2010-19734]
  7. Comunidad de Madrid [S2010/BMD-2326]
  8. ISCIII
  9. FEDER [PI10/01692, I3SNS-INT12/049]
  10. Junta de Castilla y Leon [GRS 681/A/11, SAF 2012-31142]
  11. Xunta de Galicia [EM 2012/039, 2012-CP069]
  12. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  13. Pro-CNIC Foundation
  14. European Research Council (ERC) [260464] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major health problem and the main cause of liver disease in Western countries. Although NAFLD is strongly associated with obesity and insulin resistance, its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. The disease begins with an excessive accumulation of triglycerides in the liver, which stimulates an inflammatory response. Alternative p38 mitogen-activated kinases (p38 gamma and p38 delta) have been shown to contribute to inflammation in different diseases. Here we demonstrate that p38 delta is elevated in livers of obese patients with NAFLD and that mice lacking p38 gamma/delta in myeloid cells are resistant to diet-induced fatty liver, hepatic triglyceride accumulation and glucose intolerance. This protective effect is due to defective migration of p38 gamma/delta-deficient neutrophils to the damaged liver. We further show that neutrophil infiltration in wild-type mice contributes to steatosis development by means of inflammation and liver metabolic changes. Therefore, p38 gamma and p38 delta in myeloid cells provide a potential target for NAFLD therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据