4.4 Review

Approaches to the rationalization of surgical instrument trays: scoping review and research agenda

期刊

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06142-8

关键词

Surgical tray rationalization; Surgical instruments; Surgical trays; Processes improvement; Scoping review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study systematically reviews existing literature on Surgical Tray Rationalization (STR) and proposes a roadmap with four generic steps for the implementation of STR. The research identifies key techniques within different approaches and suggests future research directions associated with the four generic steps proposed in the STR roadmap.
Background Surgical Tray Rationalization (STR) consists of a systematic reduction in the number of surgical instruments to perform specific procedures without compromising patient safety while reducing losses in the sterilization and assembly of trays. STR is one example of initiatives to improve process performance that have been widely reported in industrial settings but only recently have gained popularity in healthcare organizations. Methods We conduct a scoping review of the literature to identify and map available evidence on surgical tray management. Five methodological stages are implemented and reported; they are: identifying research questions, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing and reporting the results. Results We reviewed forty-eight articles on STR, which were grouped according to their main proposed approaches: expert analysis, lean practices, and mathematical programming. We identify the most frequently used techniques within each approach and point to their potential contributions to operational and economic dimensions of STR. We also consolidate our findings, proposing a roadmap to STR with four generic steps (prepare, rationalize, implement, and consolidate) and recommended associated techniques. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study that reviews and systematizes the existing literature on the subject of STR. Our study closes with the proposition of future research directions, which are presented as nine research questions associated with the four generic steps proposed in the STR roadmap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据