4.8 Article

Effects of antibiotics on hydrolase activity and structure of microbial community during aerobic co-composting of food waste with sewage sludge

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 321, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124506

关键词

Food waste; Sewage sludge; Aerobic composting; Physicochemical properties; Hydrolase activity; Microbial community

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1901000]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51678552, 52070177]
  3. Key Projects of Fujian Natural Science Foundation [2020J02009]
  4. Xiamen WESWQGE [201902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that adding antibiotics during co-composting affects hydrolase activity and microbial community structure, with the 5 mg/kg antibiotic treatment group showing the highest microbial diversity and the 20 mg/kg antibiotic treatment group showing the lowest richness. pH and temperature were identified as the most important environmental factors during co-composting.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of antibiotics on environmental factors, hydrolase activity, and microbial community during aerobic co-composting of food waste and sewage sludge. The results showed that 5 mg/kg of antibiotics decreased cellulase activity and increased lipase and proteinase activity, while 20 mg/kg of antibiotics also decreased cellulase activity and increased the contents of Zn, Cu, and Hg. The dominant bacterial genera of the four treatment groups were Enterococcus, Pseudomonas, Idiomarina, Lactobacillus, and Bacillus. The addition of antibiotics affected the succession of microbial community structure. Microbial communities treated with 5 mg/kg antibiotics had the highest in diversity, while those treated with 20 mg/kg antibiotics had the lowest in richness. Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that the pH and temperature were the most important environmental factors that affected microbial community succession, followed by total nitrogen and moisture content during co-composting of food waste and sewage sludge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据