4.8 Article

Green solvent pretreatment for enhanced production of sugars and antioxidative lignin from poplar

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 321, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124471

关键词

Poplar sawdust; Deep eutectic solvent; Enzymatic digestibility; Lignin

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFB1503803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The promising pretreatment using a biomass-derived deep eutectic solvent (DES) with choline chloride effectively removed lignin and xylan while preserving cellulose, resulting in a glucose yield of 75.8% under optimal conditions. The recovered lignin showed potential as a polyphenolic antioxidant due to its molecular weight, low polydispersity, and abundance of phenolic OH groups. Overall, this work demonstrated a biorefinery technology for the effective fractionation and valorization of lignocellulosic biomass.
A promising pretreatment mediated by biomass-derived deep eutectic solvent (DES) with choline chloride to lactic acid was implemented to overcome the recalcitrant structure of poplar sawdust for effective enzymatic hydrolysis and valorized lignin. Results showed the DES applied was strongly selective towards removal of lignin and xylan while preserving cellulose. Under the optimal pretreatment condition (DES ratio: 1:2, temperature: 130 degrees C, time:1.5 h), the glucose yield from enzymatic hydrolysis was 75.8%. Chemical and structure changes of recovered lignin were evaluated to gauge its valorization potential. It indicated that the recovered lignin possessed molecular weight (4000-6000 g/mol), low polydispersity (PDI < 2.0), low quantity of beta-aryl-ethers with no recondensation, and an abundance of phenolic OH groups. The excellent antioxidant capacity of lignin demonstrated its great value as a polyphenolic antioxidant. Overall, this work demonstrated an emerging biorefinery technology method for effective fractionation and valorization of lignocellulosic biomass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据