4.8 Article

Study on thermochemical characteristics properties and pyrolysis kinetics of the mixtures of waste corn stalk and pyrolusite

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 324, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124660

关键词

Pyrolusite; Waste biomass; Thermodynamic analysis; Mixed pyrolysis kinetics; Non-isothermal models

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1802255]
  2. Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Yunnan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on reducing pyrolusite using biomass pyrolysis revealed that the process can be divided into four stages, with calculated ranges of various thermodynamic parameters. This research provides a theoretical basis and practical guidance for the reduction of pyrolusite by utilizing waste corn stalk.
As an alternative energy source for fossil energy, use of biomass pyrolysis to reduce pyrolusite is of great significance for energy conservation, emission reduction and environmental protection. Kinetics and thermodynamics of reducing pyrolusite using biomass pyrolysis was studied using thermogravimetric analysis analysis. Five non-isothermal methods, Flynn-Wall-Ozawa, Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose, Distributed Activation Energy Model, Starink and Friedman, were employed to calculate the pyrolysis kinetics and thermodynamic parameters. The results showed that pyrolusite reduction by biomass pyrolysis can be divided into four stages: drying stage (30-175 degrees C), rapid pyrolysis reduction stage (175-350 degrees C), slow pyrolysis reduction stage (350-680 degrees C) and char formation stage (680-900 degrees C). The apparent activation energy, reaction enthalpy, Gibbs free energy and entropy change of pyrolusite reduction by biomass pyrolysis was calculated ranges from 170 to 180 kJ/mol, 164 to 174 kJ/mol, 136.97 to 137.25 kJ/mol and 45.67 to 61.91 J/mol.K, respectively. This work provides theoretical basis and practical guidance for the reduction of pyrolusite by waste corn stalk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据