4.8 Article

Key factors governing the performance and microbial community of one-stage partial nitritation and anammox system with bio-carriers and airlift circulation

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 324, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124668

关键词

Key factors; Bio-carriers; Partial nitritation and anammox (PNA); Airlift; Brocadia

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [P16578]
  2. China Hunan Provincial Science & Technology Department [2020JJ4602, 2017SK2361]
  3. Hunan Provincial Education Department [20A002]
  4. Changsha Bureau of Science and Technology [kq2004073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By controlling dissolved oxygen and aeration rate, stable performance can be maintained under oxygen-limiting conditions. The activation of ammonia oxidation bacteria (AOB), dominated anammox bacteria (AMX), suppression of NOB, and control of heterotrophic bacteria (HB) played a major role in achieving long-term stable operation in the biofilms.
A one-stage airlift internal circulation biofilm reactor was continuously operated for 668 days to treat 50 mg/L of ammonia wastewater to pursue the long-term stability of partial nitritation and anammox (PNA) process. The operational performance and microbial community structure of the biofilm and the flocs were investigated. A nitrogen removal efficiency (NRE) of 70% was obtained successfully at a dissolved oxygen (DO) of 0.05-0.15 mg/L by regulating aeration rate. The microbial analysis indicated Candidatus Brocadia (29.5%) and Nitrosomonas (6.8%) were dominant in both biofilms and flocs. It was found that DO control and aeration rate were the key factors in performance stability, and a stable performance could be recovered and maintained under oxygen-limiting conditions. Further, the achievement of activated ammonia oxidation bacteria (AOB), dominated anammox bacteria (AMX), suppressed NOB, and controlled heterotrophic bacteria (HB) in the biofilms played a major role in the long-term stable operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据