4.5 Article

Regeneration of PEG slide for multiple rounds of single-molecule measurements

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 120, 期 9, 页码 1788-1799

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.031

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health General Medicine [1R0S1GM115631-01A1, 1R01-CA 207342-01A1, 1RF1 NS113636-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents strategies for regenerating PEG surfaces for multiple rounds of experiments, including washing out bound proteins, reannealing double-stranded DNA, and stripping off NeutrAvidin to regenerate the biotin-PEG layer. These methods enhance the efficiency of single-molecule experiments.
Single-molecule fluorescence detection of protein and other biomolecules requires a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-passivated surface. Individual channels on a PEG-passivated slide are typically used only a few times, limiting the number of experiments per slide. Here, we report several strategies for regenerating PEG surfaces for multiple rounds of experiments. First, we show regeneration of DNA- or RNA-tethered surfaces by washing out the bound protein by 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, which is significantly more effective than 6 M urea, 6 M GdmCl, or 100 mu M proteinase K. Strikingly, 10 consecutive experiments in five different systems produced indistinguishable results both in molecule count and protein activity. Second, duplexed DNA unwound by helicase or denatured by 50 mM NaOH was reannealed with a complementary strand to regenerate the duplexed substrate with an exceptionally high recovery rate. Third, the biotin-PEG layer was regenerated by using 7 M NaOH to strip off NeutrAvidin, which can be reapplied for additional experiments. We demonstrate five cycles of regenerating antibody immobilized surface by which three different protein activity was measured. Altogether, our methods represent reliable and reproducible yet simple and rapid strategies that will enhance the efficiency of single-molecule experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据