4.7 Article

Novel coumarin-isatin hybrids as potent antileishmanial agents: Synthesis, in silico and in vitro evaluations

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.104816

关键词

Coumarin-isatin hybrids; Synthesis; Antileishmanial activity; Cytotoxicity; Molecular dynamic simulations

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan
  2. The World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) [13-419 RG/PHA/AS_CUNESCO FR: 3240279216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel coumarin-incorporated isatin hydrazones were synthesized and evaluated as potent antileishmanial agents, with three compounds showing high activity and biocompatibility in vitro experiments against Leishmania tropica.
Leishmaniasis being one of the six major tropical diseases that affects nearly 0.7-1.3 million people annually, has so far limited and high toxic therapeutic options. Herein, we report the synthesis, in silico, and in vitro evaluations of novel coumarin-incorporated isatin hydrazones (Spf-1 - Spf-10) as highly potent and safe antileishmanial agents. Molecular docking was initially carried out to decipher the binding confirmation of lead molecules towards the active cavity of the target protein (Leishmanolysin gp63) of Leishmania tropica. Among all the docked compounds, only Spf-6, Spf-8, and Spf-10 showed high binding affinities due to a pattern of strong conventional hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic pi-interactions. The molecular dynamics simulations showed the stable pattern of such bonding and structure-based confirmation with a time scale of 50 ns towards the top compound (Spf-10) and protein. These analyses affirmed the high stability of the system. Three out of ten compounds evaluated for their antileishmanial activity against Leishmania tropica promastigotes and amastigotes were found to be active at micromolar concentrations (IC50 range 0.1-4.13 mu mol/L), and most importantly, they were also found to be highly biocompatible when screened for their toxicity in human erythrocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据