4.6 Article

Control for Carbon Dioxide Exchange Process in a Membrane Oxygenator Using Online Self-Tuning Fuzzy-PID Controller

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102300

关键词

carbon dioxide removal; membrane oxygenator; PID tuning; Zeigler-Nichols continuous cycling tuning; fuzzy logic controller; self-tuning fuzzy-PID

资金

  1. University of Malaya Research Grant (UMRG) [RP015-2012G]
  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Malaya, Malaysia [PG022-2015B]
  3. University of Malaya Fellowship Scheme (SBUM) award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the performance of conventional PID, FLC, and self-tuning FPID methods for controlling the rate of CO2 removal in extracorporeal blood purification. Results indicate that self-tuning FPID outperforms the other controllers with lower oscillation, overshoot, and shorter settling time, making it the best choice for both set point tracking and load disturbance rejection tests in automation of extracorporeal circulation control.
Background and objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of conventional PID that is tuned using Zeigler-Nichols continuous cycling, Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) and self-tuning Fuzzy-PID (self-tuning FPID) methods to control the rate of CO2 removal from a membrane oxygenator during extracorporeal blood purification process. Methods: Sweep gas flow rate is chosen as the manipulated variable of arterial CO2 partial pressure (pCO(2)) in blood. The performance of these controllers is evaluated based on their response in controlling task and also by the calculation of three performance indices, namely Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Squared Error (ISE) and Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE). The robustness of the controllers using these tuning methods is then assessed for set point tracking and load disturbance rejection tests. Results: Results indicated that the self-tuning FPID is observed as the best controller compared to conventional PID and FLC with lower oscillation, overshoot and shorter settling time. As for quantitative measurement, self-tuning FPID outshines the other controllers with 0.854, 1.084 and 41.450 for IAE, ISE and ITAE, respectively in set point tracking task while 0.532 IAE, 0.016 ISE and 28.970 ITAE measured for load disturbance rejections. Conclusion: It can be concluded that self-tuning FPID is the best controller to be used in the automation of extracorporeal circulation control for both set point tracking and load disturbance rejection tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据