4.7 Article

Subtype-GAN: a deep learning approach for integrative cancer subtyping of multi-omics data

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 37, 期 16, 页码 2231-2237

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab109

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61902126]
  2. East China University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subtype-GAN is a deep adversarial learning method that accurately identifies molecular subtypes of tumor samples. It performs outstandingly on benchmark datasets and holds theoretical and practical value in analysis.
Motivation: The discovery of cancer subtyping can help explore cancer pathogenesis, determine clinical actionability in treatment, and improve patients' survival rates. However, due to the diversity and complexity of multi-omics data, it is still challenging to develop integrated clustering algorithms for tumor molecular subtyping. Results: We propose Subtype-GAN, a deep adversarial learning approach based on the multiple-input multiple-output neural network to model the complex omics data accurately. With the latent variables extracted from the neural network, Subtype-GAN uses consensus clustering and the Gaussian Mixture model to identify tumor samples' molecular subtypes. Compared with other state-of-the-art subtyping approaches, Subtype-GAN achieved outstanding performance on the benchmark datasets consisting of 4000 TCGA tumors from 10 types of cancer. We found that on the comparison dataset, the clustering scheme of Subtype-GAN is not always similar to that of the deep learning method AE but is identical to that of NEMO, MCCA, VAE and other excellent approaches. Finally, we applied Subtype-GAN to the BRCA dataset and automatically obtained the number of subtypes and the subtype labels of 1031 BRCA tumors. Through the detailed analysis, we found that the identified subtypes are clinically meaningful and show distinct patterns in the feature space, demonstrating the practicality of Subtype-GAN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据