4.7 Article

Reduced graphene oxide@polydopamine decorated carbon cloth as an anode for a high-performance microbial fuel cell in Congo red/saline wastewater removal

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107675

关键词

Polydopamine; Startup time; Hydrophilic; Microbial fuel cell; Wastewater degradation

资金

  1. Key R&D Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018YFC1803100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A dopamine-decorated reduced oxide graphene anode on carbon cloth for microbial fuel cells was prepared, providing superhydrophilicity, high conductivity, good biocompatibility, and long-term stability. This structure promoted bacteria growth, electron transfer, and achieved high performance MFC with fast startup time and efficient decolorization.
A polydopamine decorated reduced oxide graphene (rGO@PDA) on carbon cloth (CC) as microbial fuel cell (MFC) anode was prepared by using dopamine polymerized reduction of oxide graphene. The anodes provided superhydrophilicity, high conductivity, good biocompatibility and long-term stability due to the combination of inorganic/organic components. These components and the resulting structure promoted enhancement of bacteria growth and enrichment, accelerated extracellular electron transfer between bacteria and anode surface, gained a high-performance rGO@PDA/CC MFC. The device achieved a short startup time of 18 h, maximum power density of 988.1 +/- 5.2 mW.m(-2) and Congo red decolorization efficiency of 89.7 +/- 2.4% within 24 h. When Congo red and sodium acetate were continuously degraded, removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand increased 77.8 +/- 3.5% and 88.5 +/- 5.8%, respectively. Thus, the synergistic effect of rGO and PDA effectively enhanced startup speed, power generation and pollutant degradation. The degradation products of Congo red were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Congo red was degraded to small organic molecules without azo bonds. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据