4.5 Article

Effects of country and individual factors on public acceptance of artificial intelligence and robotics technologies: a multilevel SEM analysis of 28-country survey data

期刊

BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 1515-1528

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1884288

关键词

Technology acceptance; multilevel SEM; AI; Robot acceptance; public opinion on technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the factors influencing public attitude towards AI/Robot, finding that individual factors like perceived job loss threat and digital technology efficacy predict acceptance. While country-level factors like economic development and innovation do not directly influence acceptance, they affect perceptions of job loss threat and digital technology efficacy. The research enriches the Technology Acceptance Model by incorporating predictive variables at individual and country levels.
Using data from 28 European countries, this study examines factors influencing public attitude towards the use of AI/Robot. Its multilevel SEM analysis finds that several factors at the individual level including Perceived threat of job loss and Digital technology efficacy predict public Acceptance of AI/Robot. Although country-level factors such as economic development, government effectiveness and innovation do not directly influence public acceptance of AI/Robot, they do have significant effects on Perceived threat of general job loss due to AI/Robot, and Digital technology efficacy. Findings indicate that these nationally macro variables influence people's perceptions of AI and robotics technologies and their confidence in their digital skills. This research enriches the application of the Technology Acceptance Model by using predictive variables at two levels: individual and country. Furthermore, at the individual level, this study uses two variables (e.g. Perceived threat of job loss and Digital technology efficacy) that are unconventional to TAM, thus contributing to this theoretical model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据