4.7 Article

The Photospheric Footpoints of Solar Coronal Hole Jets

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 909, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd5ad

关键词

Solar magnetic fields; Solar physics; Solar coronal holes; Solar photosphere; Eruptive phenomena; Solar ultraviolet emission; Solar magnetic reconnection; Solar magnetic bright points; Solar coronal transients; Solar atmospheric motions; Solar corona

资金

  1. NSF [AGS-1159353]
  2. NASA [80NSSC18K0716]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the photospheric footpoints of coronal jets observed by Hinode/EIS and finds that the observed magnetic flux evolution, flow field structure and footpoint locations do not support current jet simulation scenarios. More detailed numerical simulations using observed photospheric features are needed to provide a realistic eruptive event scenario.
We study the photospheric footpoints of a set of 35 coronal jets in a coronal hole as observed by Hinode/EIS. We use SDO/AIA data to coalign the spectroscopic EIS data with SDO/HMI line-of-sight magnetograms and calculate the plane-of-sky flow field using local correlation tracking (LCT) on SDO/HMI white light images. The jets are put into categories according to the changes observed in the photospheric magnetic flux at the footpoints of the coronal bright point where the jets originate: flux cancellation, complex flux changes (flux appearance/emergence and cancellation), and no flux changes. We also present three jets in detail. Observed magnetic flux evolution, LCT flow field structure and location of the jet footpoints at supergranular boundaries do not support the flux emergence scenario used in most jet simulations and are also not consistent with a rotational photospheric driver. Detailed numerical jet simulations using our observed photospheric features, in particular converging flows and flux cancellation do not currently exist, although such models would provide a realistic eruptive event scenario.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据