4.0 Article

A roadmap to strange star

期刊

ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN
卷 342, 期 1-2, 页码 320-325

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asna.202113927

关键词

pulsar; neutron star; dense matter; elementary particles

资金

  1. Hubei Provincial Department of Education [D20183002]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS [XDB23010200]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1831104, 11673002]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0402602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the 1930s, scientists have been exploring the scenario where normal baryonic matter is compressed so tightly that atomic nuclei come into close contact. Lev Landau introduced the concept of neutron stars, while the idea of strange stars gained attention after the standard model of particle physics was established in the 1960s. Research suggests that the strong-bound surface of strange stars may be crucial in identifying them through astronomical observations.
What if normal baryonic matter is compressed so tightly that atomic nuclei come into close contact? This question has been asked since 1930s. The first answer was presented by Lev Landau whose speculation has been developed, and the concept of neutron star is then popularized. However, another answer is related to strange star, which becomes worthy of attention especially after the establishment of the standard model of particle physics in 1960s. The basic ideas of this study are introduced pedagogically. We must point out emphatically that flavor symmetry and strong coupling between quarks would be essential in seeking true answer to the question. The final answer is expected to appear in the era of multimessenger astronomy. It is emphasized too that, besides the differences of global properties (e.g., mass-radius relation, maximum mass, tidal deformability), the strong-bound surface of strange star (rather than the gravity-bound one for conventional neutron star) could play an important role in identifying a strange star by astronomical observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据