4.2 Review

Review of systemic chemotherapy in unresectable colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13552

关键词

5‐ fluorouracil; bevacizumab; cetuximab; panitumumab; targeted therapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy in Australia, with peritoneum being the second most common metastatic site. Treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC) is limited to a small subset of patients, with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens showing benefits in overall and progression-free survival. The role of targeted agents like bevacizumab and cetuximab in CPC is still evolving, with promising results seen with bevacizumab but not with cetuximab in combination with systemic chemotherapy.
Colorectal cancer remains the third most common malignancy in Australia with the peritoneum being the second most common metastatic site. Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC) can be treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy but this is only limited to a small subset of patients. Those with inoperable disease have a particularly poor prognosis. While the ideal systemic regimen has not been defined, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens appear to provide overall and progression free survival benefits. The role of targeted agents such as bevacizumab (vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor) or cetuximab (epidermal growth factor inhibitor) in the setting of CPC is still evolving. Currently, retrospective analyses have shown promising results for the use of bevacizumab in addition to systemic chemotherapy but similar results have not been seen with cetuximab or panitumumab. However, there is significant heterogeneity in the trial data, lack of prospective randomized controlled trials and demonstrated treatment variability based on age and tumour characteristics. This review summarises the current literature in regard to treatment in the unresectable CPC setting as well as discussing issues with the current data and highlighting the need for further trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据