4.6 Review

Recent progress in development and applications of second near-infrared (NIR-II) nanoprobes

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 165-181

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12272-021-01313-x

关键词

NIR-II nanoprobes; Photothermal therapy; Photodynamic therapy; Photoacoustic Imaging; Fluorescence Imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NIR technology offers advantages in biomedical imaging and treatment, with the NIR-II window showing superiority over the NIR-I window in terms of better light penetration and lower background signal, allowing for deeper lesion treatment.
Optical probes for near-infrared (NIR) light have clear advantages over UV/VIS-based optical probes, such as their low levels of interfering auto-fluorescence and high tissue penetration. The second NIR (NIR-II) window (1000-1350 nm) offers better light penetration, lower background signal, higher safety limit, and higher maximum permitted exposure than the first NIR (NIR-I) window (650-950 nm). Therefore, NIR-II laser-based photoacoustic (PA) and fluorescence (FL) imaging can offer higher sensitivity and penetration depth than was previously available, and deeper lesions can be treated in vivo by photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) with an NIR-II laser than with an NIR-I laser. Advances in creation of novel nanomaterials have increased options for improving light-induced bioimaging and treatment. Nanotechnology can provide advantages such as good disease targeting ability and relatively long circulation times to supplement the advantages of optical technologies. In this review, we present recent progress in development and applications of NIR-II light-based nanoplatforms for FL, PA, image-guided surgery, PDT, and PTT. We also discuss recent advances in smart NIR-II nanoprobes that can respond to stimuli in the tumor microenvironment and inflamed sites. Finally, we consider the challenges involved in using NIR-II nanomedicine for effective diagnosis and treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据