4.4 Review

Does hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum improve reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
卷 303, 期 5, 页码 1131-1142

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-05975-2

关键词

Uterine septum; Septum resection; Reproductive outcomes; Hysteroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hysteroscopic septum resection was found to be associated with a lower rate of miscarriage compared to untreated women, but did not significantly affect live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, or preterm delivery. Additionally, there were fewer malpresentations during labor in the treated group. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are recommended to draw conclusive clinical guidance.
Purpose Uterine septum in women with subfertility or previous poor reproductive outcomes presents a clinical dilemma. Hysteroscopic septum resection has been previously associated with adverse reproductive outcomes but the evidence remains inconclusive. We aimed to thoroughly and systematically appraise relevant evidence on the impact of hysteroscopically resecting the uterine septum on this cohort of women. Methods AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, Medline, PsychInfo, PubMed, Cochrane register of controlled trials, Cochrane database of systematic reviews and CINAHL were assessed to April 2020, with no language restriction. Only randomised control trials and comparative studies which evaluated outcomes in women with uterine septum and a history of subfertility and/or poor reproductive outcomes treated by hysteroscopic septum resection against control were included. The primary endpoint was live birth rate, whereas clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, preterm birth and malpresentation rates were secondary outcomes. Results Seven studies involving 407 women with hysteroscopic septum resection and 252 with conservative management were included in the meta-analysis. Hysteroscopic septum resection was associated with a lower rate of miscarriage (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.88) compared with untreated women. No significant effect was seen on live birth, clinical pregnancy rate or preterm delivery. However, there were fewer malpresentations during labour in the treated group (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.73). Conclusion Our review found no significant effect of hysteroscopic resection on live birth. However, given the limited evidence available, high-quality randomised controlled trials are recommended before any conclusive clinical guidance can be drawn.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据