4.5 Article

Hypotension in Preterm Infants (HIP) randomised trial

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320241

关键词

cardiology; neonatology; pharmacology

资金

  1. EU [260777]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate whether restricting the use of inotrope after diagnosis of low blood pressure in the first 72 hours of life affects survival without significant brain injury at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age in infants born before 28 weeks of gestation. The trial was terminated early due to enrollment issues, but the results did not show major differences in outcomes between standard and restrictive approaches to treatment.
Objective To determine whether restricting the use of inotrope after diagnosis of low blood pressure (BP) in the first 72 hours of life affects survival without significant brain injury at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA) in infants born before 28 weeks of gestation. Design Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Caregivers were masked to group assignment. Setting 10 sites across Europe and Canada. Participants Infants born before 28 weeks of gestation were eligible if they had an invasive mean BP less than their gestational age that persisted for >= 15 min in the first 72 hours of life and a cerebral ultrasound free of significant (>= grade 3) intraventricular haemorrhage. Intervention Participants were randomly assigned to saline bolus followed by either a dopamine infusion (standard management) or placebo (5% dextrose) infusion (restrictive management). Primary outcome Survival to 36 weeks of PMA without severe brain injury. Results The trial terminated early due to significant enrolment issues (7.7% of planned recruitment). 58 infants were enrolled between February 2015 and September 2017. The two groups were well matched for baseline variables. In the standard group, 18/29 (62%) achieved the primary outcome compared with 20/29 (69%) in the restrictive group (p=0.58). Additional treatments for low BP were used less frequently in the standard arm (11/29 (38%) vs 19/29 (66%), p=0.038). Conclusion Though this study lacked power, we did not detect major differences in clinical outcomes between standard or restrictive approach to treatment. These results will inform future studies in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据