4.7 Article

Application of down-flow hanging sponge - Upflow sludge blanket system for nitrogen removal in Epinephelus bruneus closed recirculating aquaculture system

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 532, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735997

关键词

Recirculatingaquaculture system; DHS; Nitrification; Epinephelus bruneus; Microbial dynamics

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [17H06703]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H06703] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combined pilot-scale system of DHS reactors and USB reactors effectively removed nitrogen and maintained water quality in a recirculating aquaculture system for longtooth groupers. The high survival rate and growth rate of fish in the study suggest that the DHS-USB system is a novel and applicable method for nitrogen removal in aquaculture systems, recommending further large-scale studies.
A high-rate nitrogen removal process is required to maintain the water quality in aquaculture tanks used to produce high-density fish populations in recirculating aquaculture systems. In this study, a combined pilot-scale system of down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) reactors and upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactors was applied as a nitrogen removal system for a longtooth grouper Epinephelus bruneus recirculating aquaculture system. The DHS reactors demonstrated high total ammonium nitrogen (TAN) removal efficiencies and the TAN concentration in the aquaculture tank was maintained at 0.32 0.12 mg-N.L-1. The USB reactor fed with sodium acetate acted as a denitrification unit and adjusted the pH through denitrification reaction. All E. bruneus survived the entire experimental period and the daily weight gain rate of 0.6%day(-1) was comparable to that in marine aquaculture. This result shows that the DHS-USB system to be a novel applicable system for nitrogen removal processes in recirculating aquaculture systems and further study at a large scale should be recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据