4.7 Article

Energy saving analysis of evaporative cooling composite air conditioning system for data centers

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116506

关键词

Data center; Composite air conditioning system; Water-cooled heat exchanger; Energy saving; Climate zone

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778115]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N182502043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An evaporative cooling composite air conditioning system was proposed to enhance the energy efficiency of data centers. Mathematical models based on the system's operation characteristics were established and verified by experiments. The use of a water-cooled heat exchanger further improved the energy saving performance of the system in different climatic zones.
An evaporative cooling composite air conditioning system aimed at enhancing energy efficiency of data centers was proposed. Furthermore, the mathematical models on the base of the operation characteristics of the system were established. After verification by experiment, the energy saving performance of the system under different climatic conditions was investigated. The simulation results showed that the annual performance factor (APF) values are 5.31, 5.02, 4.75 and 4.50, respectively in severe cold zone-Shenyang (123.38E, 41.8N), cold zone-Beijing (116.30E, 39.9N), hot summer & cold winter zone-Nanjing (118.78E, 32.0N) and mild zone-Kunming (102.72E, 25.1N). The power usage effectiveness (PUE) values are below 1.40, the system has good energy saving advantages in different locations. After a water-cooled heat exchanger is used in the evaporative condenser, the APF values improve in all the four cities. The use of water-cooled heat exchanger is beneficial to further enhance energy saving of the system. A case study based on the system elaborates that it is feasible for energy saving of data centers in various climatic zones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据