4.7 Article

Thermodynamic feasibility evaluation of an innovative salinity gradient solar ponds-based ORC using a zeotropic mixture as working fluid and LNG cold energy

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116488

关键词

Transient analysis; Salinity gradient solar ponds; Organic rankine cycle; Zeotropic mixture; LNG cold energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the thermodynamic feasibility of a salinity gradient solar pond-based power generation system utilizing a dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and liquefied natural gas cold energy. Transient analysis was conducted to ensure reliable results. The optimal thermal performance was achieved with the zeotropic mixture R245ca/R236ea, leading to a high energy efficiency in Urmia, Iran.
Thermodynamic feasibility evaluation is investigated for a salinity gradient solar pond-based power generation system. A dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle using the zeotropic mixture as working fluid is employed for power generation. To increase power generation, liquefied natural gas cold energy is used as a heat sink. Furthermore, to reach reliable results, transient analysis is conducted on the overall system. Also, the solar pond walls shading effect as well as heat losses that could not be ignored (i.e., evaporation heat loss from pond surface) is considered in the simulation. The results show that for a system located in Urmia, Iran, the annual average solar pond energy efficiency for the first year is obtained 20%. Different zeotropic mixtures are examined to achieve the optimal thermal performance of the system. It is concluded that the system using R245ca/R236ea with a mass fraction of 0.6/0.4 has the optimal thermal performance among selected zeotropic mixtures. In this case, the values of the system generated power and exergy destruction are obtained 95.67 MJ year(-1) m(-2) and 133.7 MJ year(-1) m(-2), respectively, with an energy efficiency of 3.28%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据