4.7 Article

Performance of a miniature ejector for application in a nitrogen Joule-Thomson cycle: Experimental and numerical analysis

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116357

关键词

Ejector; Joule-Thomson effect; Cryocooler; 3D printing; Turbulence modeling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52076115]
  2. Networking/Partnering Initiative of European Space Agency (ESA) [4000114493/15/NL/KML/fg]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a miniature ejector with a nozzle throat diameter of 162 micrometers, measured using X-ray computed tomography, and investigates its performance under different operating conditions, demonstrating its applicability in a Joule-Thomson cooling cycle.
The performance of Joule-Thomson (JT) cryocoolers can be improved by introducing ejectors. Ejectors with various geometric features have been proposed and investigated for cryogenic cooling in earlier studies, but only limited research is done on ejectors with a nozzle throat diameter less than 1 mm. In this paper, we present a miniature ejector with a nozzle throat diameter of 162 mu m that was measured using X-ray computed tomography. When the ejector was operated with nitrogen gas at 295 K with a primary inlet pressure of 80 bar, a secondary inlet pressure of 0.5 bar and an outlet pressure of 1.2 bar, the primary and the secondary mass-flow rates were 394 mg/s and 83 mg/s, respectively. The measured primary mass-flow rate was quite close to the value predicted by a dynamic model, whereas the measured secondary mass-flow rate was lower than the predicted value, which was mainly caused by a non-axisymmetric machining defect of the nozzle that was assumed to be axisymmetric in the dynamic model. Besides, the effects of operating pressures and nozzle position on the ejector performance were analyzed. The study demonstrates the applicability of a miniature ejector in a JT cooling cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据