4.7 Article

Enhancement of efficiency and stability in organic solar cells by employing MoS2 transport layer, graphene electrode, and graphene quantum dots-added active layer

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 538, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148155

关键词

MoS2; Graphene; Graphene quantum dot; Organic solar cell; Flexibility; Stability

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2020R1A2C2004376]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2C2004376] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing new materials such as MoS2 and GQDs, the efficiency and stability of flexible organic solar cells can be improved, leading to better power conversion efficiency and mechanical flexibility.
For enhancing efficiency and flexibility of organic solar cells, new constituent materials are highly required. Here, we first report flexible organic solar cells (FOSCs) by employing MoS2 hole transport layer (HTL), bis (trifluoromethanesulfonyl)-amide-doped graphene (TFSA-GR) transparent conductive electrode (TCE), and GR quantum dots (GQDs)-added active layer. Power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the FOSCs without GQDs strongly depends on number of layers (Ln) of MoS2 as well as on doping concentration (nD) of TFSA-GR, thereby showing maximum PCE of 3.56% at L-n = 2 and n(D) = 20 mM, resulting from the lowest resistance at the TCE/MoS2/active layer interfaces. The long-term stability of the FOSCs is almost two times better than that of their counterparts with conventional organic HTL. By adding GQDs in the active layer, the PCE is further enhanced to 4.23% and is maintained at 89/82% of the original value after inner/outer repeated bending tests for 1000 cycles, respectively, indicating outstanding mechanical stability. These results suggest that GQDs are very useful for the active layer of FOSCs with better PCE and flexibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据