4.7 Article

In-depth distribution of elements and chemical bonds in the surface region of calcium-doped diamond-like carbon films

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 539, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148250

关键词

Ca-doped DLC; ARXPS/MEM; In-depth distribution; CaCO3; C sp(3)/C sp(2); Dual structural conversion

资金

  1. CTU Grant Agency [SGS18/157/OHK4/2T/17]
  2. project Strategy AV21, program Diagnostic Methods and Techniques
  3. Operational Programme Research, Development and Education - EU Structural and Investment Funds
  4. MEYS CR [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008382]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study used ARXPS and MEM techniques to analyze the surface composition and chemical bonds of calcium-doped DLC layers, revealing significant variations in compounds and chemical bonds between the surface and shallow sub-surface regions.
In the present work we determined surface composition and chemical bonds at the top surface and in a shallow sub-surface region of the calcium-doped diamond-like carbon (DLC) layers using angular-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS) aided by the Maximum Entropy Method (MEM). The resulting non-destructive depth profiles showed that the composition and the chemical bonding vary significantly on the way from the top surface to the shallow sub-surface region. We demonstrate, for the first time, that Ca doping induced (i) the accumulation of the calcium carbonate, CaCO3, at the surface, while the calcium oxide, CaO, is located in a deeper sub-surface region, (ii) structural conversion from the C sp(2)-rich top surface observed in the undoped DLC layer to the C sp(3)-rich top surface of the Ca-doped DLC samples, and (iii) conversion in the opposite direction which occurred in a sub-surface region. Our conclusions are consistent with Raman and Ion Surface Scattering spectra. Obtained results can be useful for deeper understanding the interaction between doped DLC layer surfaces with surroundings and particularly with living tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据