4.7 Article

Coverage-dependent structure and reactivity of vanadia clusters supported on anatase TiO2(101) surface

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 543, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148774

关键词

Vanadium oxide clusters; TiO2 surface; First-principle calculation; Atomic and electronic structures; Reactivity

资金

  1. NSAF Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1630118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that vanadium oxide clusters supported on anatase TiO2(101) surface exhibit different aggregation behaviors based on coverage, with monomeric clusters predominant at low coverage and polymeric clusters more popular at higher coverage. The molecular adsorption of NH3 can be enhanced on all supported structures, but NH3 dissociation only occurs on VO3/A(101).
The atomic structures of VOx clusters supported on anatase TiO2(101) surface (A(101)) at different coverages are explored based on an evolutionary method. The structures exhibit clear coverage-dependent feature. Unlike those supported on rutile TiO2 surface, monomeric vanania clusters supported on anatase surface do not favor aggregation. At low coverage, monomeric clusters (VO2 or VO3) are the main products, while at higher coverage (>= 0.25 ML) polymeric clusters become more popular. Using the hydrogenation energy and oxygen vacancy formation energy as descriptors, and the dissociation of NH3 as example, the reactivity of each stable structure is studied. The results show that VO3/A(101) possesses particularly high reactivity, and the supporting of V2O5 and V3O6 clusters can also improve the chemical reactivity of A(101) surface. The molecular adsorption of NH3 can be enhanced on all the supported VmOn/A(101) structures, while its dissociation can only occur on VO3/A(101), which implies that the one-site mechanism of the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) reaction of NOx with ammonia only acts at low coverage of vanadium oxide (<0.25 ML).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据