4.7 Article

Prediction of air-overpressure induced by blasting using an ANFIS-PNN model optimized by GA

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106904

关键词

Air-overpressure; ANFIS; PNN; Genetic algorithm; Hybrid Intelligence-based technique

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the consequences of air-overpressure in blasting operations using the Fuzzy Delphi method. A new hybrid intelligent technique, ANFIS-PNNGA, was developed to optimize the prediction model for AOp, showing more accurate results compared to other methods.
Blasting operations typically have several negative impacts upon human beings and constructions in adjacent region. Among all, air-overpressure (AOp) has been persistently attractive to practitioners and researchers. To control the AOp-induced damage, its strength should be predicted before conducting a blasting operation. This paper analyzes the AOp consequences through the use of the Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM). The method was adopted to identify the key variables with the deepest influence on AOp based on the experts' opinions. Then, the most effective parameters on AOp were selected to be used in developing a new hybrid intelligent technique, i.e., adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)-polynomial neural network (PNN) optimized by the genetic algorithm (GA), called ANFIS-PNNGA. From FDM and experts' opinions, four parameters, i.e., amount of explosive charge, powder factor, stemming, and distance from the blast-face were identified as the most effective ones on AOp. In fact, in ANFIS-PNN-GA system, GA was used to optimize the ANFIS-PNN structure. The new framework of ANFIS-PNN-GA was developed, trained, and tested on actual datasets collected from a total of 62 blasting events. To show capability of the newly-proposed model, the ANFIS and PNN predictive models were also constructed to estimate AOp, and the performance prediction of the proposed models were evaluated through the use of several performance indices, e.g., correlation coefficient (R) and mean square error (MSE). R values of (0.94, 0.72, and 0.84) and (0.92, 0.58, and 0.77) and MSE values of (0.003, 0.03, and 0.021) and (0.005, 0.066, and 0.05) were obtained for training and testing datasets of ANFIS-PNN-GA, PNN, and ANFIS models, respectively. Accordingly, because of the role of GA as a practical optimization algorithm in improving the efficiency of both PNN and ANFIS models, results obtained by the ANFIS-PNN-GA model are more accurate compared to other implemented methods. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据