4.6 Article

Computational inverse design for ultra-compact single-piece metalenses free of chromatic and angular aberration

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0035419

关键词

-

资金

  1. Villum Fonden through the NATEC (NAnophotonics for TErabit Communications) Centre [8692]
  2. Danish National Research Foundation through NanoPhoton Center for Nanophotonics [DNRF147]
  3. U.S. Army Research Office through the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies [W911NF-18-2-0048]
  4. MIT-IBM Watson AI Laboratory [2415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a full-Maxwell topology-optimized design of a single-piece multilayer metalens that can simultaneously focus within a 60-degree angular range and a 23% spectral bandwidth without suffering chromatic or angular aberration. The design achieves diffraction-limited focusing and an absolute focusing efficiency of over 50% at all angles and frequencies, demonstrating ultra-compact multifunctionality. This paves the way for future work on design and fabrication of multilayer metaoptics.
We present full-Maxwell topology-optimization design of a single-piece multilayer metalens, about 10 wavelengths lambda in thickness, which simultaneously focuses over a 60 degrees angular range and a 23% spectral bandwidth without suffering chromatic or angular aberration, a plan-achromat. At all angles and frequencies, it achieves diffraction-limited focusing (Strehl ratio>0.8) and an absolute focusing efficiency of >50%. Both 2D and 3D axisymmetric designs are presented, optimized over similar to 10 5 degrees of freedom. We also demonstrate shortening the lens-to-sensor distance while producing the same image as for a longer virtual focal length and maintaining plan-achromaticity. These proof-of-concept designs demonstrate the ultra-compact multifunctionality that can be achieved by exploiting the full wave physics of subwavelength designs and motivate future work on design and fabrication of multilayer metaoptics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据