4.6 Article

Visualization of large-scale charged domain Walls in hexagonal manganites

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 118, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0040512

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [G2018KY0305, G2020KY0501]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0307900]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [Z190011]
  4. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars
  5. DOE [DE-FG02-07ER46382]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By creatively adopting an inclined polishing process, the study revealed the presence of large-scale CDWs in ferroelectric manganites, offering a new potential for the design of nano-devices.
A ferroelectric charged domain wall (CDW) carries bound charges, originating from the variation of the normal components of polarization across the domain boundary, leading to a possible two-dimensional conductive interface in insulating materials. The ferroelectric CDW can be precisely created, erased, and manipulated, therefore offering an intriguing pathway toward the design of nano-devices. However, due to rather large energy costs, the size of the CDW is usually on the nanoscale. Here, taking flux-grown ferroelectric hexagonal manganites (h-RMnO3) as an example, we creatively adopted an accessible inclined polishing process to reveal the domain evolution of stripe, loop, and vortex domain patterns by depth profiling. Interestingly, we observed an unexpected large-scale straight CDW in as-grown LuMnO3 with length up to a millimeter size, which may result from the polar catastrophe during the flux growth. The large-scale CDW has a residual influence on the formation of the loop domain when the crystal anneals below the ferroelectric transition temperature, but completely disappears as the topological vortices emerge. The observed large-scale CDWs make h-RMnO3 a potential candidate for advanced electronic devices, leading to a panoply of desired properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据