4.6 Article

Advanced hydrogenation process applied on Ge on Si quantum dots for enhanced light emission

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 118, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0036039

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y1238-N36, P30564-NBL]
  2. Linz Institute of Technology (LIT) [LIT-2019-7-SEE-114]
  3. EU H2020 QantERA ERA-NET via the Quantum Technologies project CUSPIDOR
  4. FWF [I3760]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of using hydrogenation process to repair point defects on a silicon-on-insulator platform, resulting in a significant increase in photoluminescence yield and showing the potential of hydrogenation technique in repairing harmful defects. The enhancement of photoluminescence yield for DEQDs grown on SOI substrates is particularly promising, indicating potential significance for future photonic integrated circuits.
For the development of photonic integrated circuits, it is mandatory to implement light sources on a Si-on-insulator (SOI) platform. However, point defects in the Si matrix and, e.g., at the Si/SiO2 interface act as nonradiative recombination channels, drastically limiting the performance of Si-based light emitters. In this Letter, we study how these defects can be healed by applying an advanced hydrogenation process, recently developed in photovoltaic research for the passivation of performance-limiting defects in Si solar cells. Upon hydrogenation, we observe an increase in the room temperature photoluminescence (PL) yield by a factor of more than three for defect-enhanced quantum dots (DEQDs) grown on float-zone Si substrates, revealing the potential of this technique to passivate detrimental defects. For DEQDs grown using SOI substrates, the PL yield enhancement even exceeds a factor of four, which we attribute to the additional passivation of defects originating from the substrate. The results for SOI substrates are of particular interest due to their relevance for future photonic integrated circuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据