4.5 Article

Insight into segregation sites for oxygen impurities at grain boundaries in silicon

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS EXPRESS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.35848/1882-0786/abe80d

关键词

grain boundary segregation; low-temperature focused ion beam; ab initio local stress calculations; atomic probe tomography; silicon; oxygen

资金

  1. Multicrystalline informatics toward establishment of general grain boundary physics and realization of high-quality silicon ingot with ideal microstructures project in JST/CREST [JPMJCR17J1]
  2. GIMRT Program in IMR, Tohoku University [20M0403]
  3. Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices: Dynamic Alliance for Open Innovation Bridging Human, Environment and Materials Program in ISIR, Osaka University [20201231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through the use of atom probe tomography combined with a focused ion beam operated at -150 degrees C, the three-dimensional distribution of oxygen atoms segregated at sigma 9{114} grain boundaries in Czochralski-grown silicon ingots was analyzed with high spatial resolution. The analysis revealed a narrow segregation range of oxygen atoms across the grain boundary plane, with segregation sites existing at bond-centered sites under tensile stresses above 2 GPa, as calculated by ab initio local stress calculations.
The three-dimensional distribution of oxygen atoms segregated at sigma 9{114} grain boundaries (GBs) in Czochralski-grown silicon ingots is analyzed within a high spatial resolution of less than 0.5 nm by atom probe tomography combined with a focused ion beam (FIB) operated at -150 degrees C. The analysis reveals a segregation of oxygen atoms within a range of 2.5 nm across the GB plane, which is much narrower in comparison with the previous reports obtained using a conventional FIB. The oxygen concentration profile accurately reflects the distribution of the segregation sites, which exist at bond-centered sites under tensile stresses above 2 GPa, as calculated by ab initio local stress calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据