4.7 Review

Substrate properties as controlling parameters in attached algal cultivation

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 105, 期 5, 页码 1823-1835

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11127-y

关键词

Attached algae; Algal biofilm; Attachment adaptation; Filamentous algae; ATS; Periphyton

资金

  1. USDA National Institutes of Food and Agriculture [2017-67020-26398]
  2. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station of Auburn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a growing interest in attached algae cultivation systems as a more cost- and energy-efficient alternative to planktonic systems. However, attached growth systems have been studied less compared to planktonic systems, highlighting the need for further research in this area.
There is growing interest in attached algae cultivation systems because they could provide a more cost- and energy-efficient alternative to planktonic (suspended algae) cultivation systems for many applications. However, attached growth systems have been far less studied than planktonic systems and have largely emphasized algae strains of most interest for biofuels. New algal biorefinery pathways have assessed the commercial potentials of algal biomass beyond biofuel production and placed more emphasis on value-added products from that biomass. Therefore, algal strain selection criteria and biomass cultivation methods need to be updated to include additional strains for improved efficiency. One possible way of improving attached cultivation systems is through engineering substrate surface characteristics to boost algal adhesion and enable strain selective algal colonization and growth. This review explores the effect of substrate chemical and topographical characteristics on the cultivation of attached algae. It also highlights the importance of considering algal community structure and attachment mechanisms in investigating attached algae systems using the example of filamentous algae found in algal turf scrubber (ATS (TM)) systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据