4.7 Article

Wide absorption bandwidth of a light composite absorber based on micro-perforated sandwich panel

期刊

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107735

关键词

Wide absorption bandwidth; Light composite absorber; Acoustic impedance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11772251]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M663655]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A light composite absorber with a micro-perforated sandwich panel filled with thin porous materials is proposed in this study to achieve a wide absorption bandwidth. The theoretical model derived by the transfer matrix method is in good agreement with experimental results, showing better performance compared to other absorbers. The absorption mechanism and the effects of internal components on absorption performance are analyzed in detail.
We present a light composite absorber consisting of a micro-perforated sandwich panel (MSP) filled with a thin porous materials, to achieve a wide absorption bandwidth. The MSP is of 1 mm thickness scale and possesses the excellent mechanic properties in contrast to a single homogeneous panel. The theoretical model of the light composite absorber is derived by the transfer matrix method, and is well agreed with the experimental results. The proposed absorber predicts a wider 0.5 relative absorption bandwidth and higher absorption coefficient, compared with the micro-perforated panel (MPP) absorber or the double-MPPs absorber. The absorption mechanism owing to the addition of the thin porous materials is conducted by analyzing the reflection coefficient, surface acoustic impedance, acoustic pressure and local velocity. The influences of the thickness, porosity, and hole diameter of the internal components on the absorption bandwidth and absorption peak are discussed. The proposed absorber has a wide scope of potential applications under multi-functional noise-controlled conditions. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据