4.5 Review Book Chapter

Molecular Force Measurement with Tension Sensors

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS, VOL 50, 2021
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 595-616

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-101920-064756

关键词

mechanobiology; mechanosensitivity; mechanotransduction; tension sensor; mechanical force; FRET

资金

  1. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0024]
  2. Volkswagen Stiftung
  3. German Research Council (DFG) through the DFG-ANR program [SFB863-1111662409, SFB1348, SPP1782]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability of cells to sense and respond to mechanical signals is crucial for physiological processes, and the development of molecular tension sensors has provided a new method to quantify forces at the molecular level. This technology has the potential to uncover novel aspects of mechanobiology in the future.
The ability of cells to generate mechanical forces, but also to sense, adapt to, and respond to mechanical signals, is crucial for many developmental, postnatal homeostatic, and pathophysiological processes. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying cellular mechanotransduction have remained elusive for many decades, as techniques to visualize and quantify molecular forces across individual proteins in cells were missing. The development of genetically encoded molecular tension sensors now allows the quantification of piconewton-scale forces that act upon distinct molecules in living cells and even whole organisms. In this review, we discuss the physical principles, advantages, and limitations of this increasingly popular method. By highlighting current examples from the literature, we demonstrate how molecular tension sensors can be utilized to obtain access to previously unappreciated biophysical parameters that define the propagation of mechanical forces on molecular scales. We discuss how the methodology can be further developed and provide a perspective on how the technique could be applied to uncover entirely novel aspects of mechanobiology in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据