4.7 Article

Olaparib monotherapy as primary treatment in unselected triple negative breast cancer

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 240-249

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.009

关键词

triple negative breast cancer; PARP inhibitor; olaparib; homologous recombination deficiency; prediction; neoadjuvant therapy

类别

资金

  1. K.G. Jebsen Foundation [SKGJ-MED-020]
  2. Helse Vest [912008, 912252]
  3. Norwegian Research Council [273354]
  4. Norwegian Cancer Society [190281-2017, 190275-2017]
  5. la Caixa Foundation
  6. European Institute of Innovation and Technology/Horizon 2020 [LCF/TR/CC19/52470003]
  7. Generalitat de Catalunya (PERIS Fellowship) [SLT002/16/00477]
  8. Miguel Servet fellowship [CPII19/00033]
  9. AstraZeneca [ESR-14-10077]
  10. ERA PerMed [2019-215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In primary treatment-naive triple negative breast cancer patients, olaparib showed a high clinical response rate in patients with homologous recombination deficiency, surpassing those without this defect. This demonstrates the effectiveness of olaparib in this population.
Background: The antitumor efficacy of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) for breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutations is well established. While PARPi monotherapy was ineffective in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) wild type for BRCA1/2, we hypothesized that PARPi may be effective in primary TNBCs without previous chemotherapy exposure. Patients and methods: In the phase II PETREMAC trial, patients with primary TNBC >2 cm received olaparib for up to 10 weeks before chemotherapy. Tumor biopsies collected before and after olaparib underwent targeted DNA sequencing (360 genes) and BRCA1 methylation analyses. In addition, BRCAness (multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification), PAM50 gene expression, RAD51 foci, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-L1 analyses were performed on pretreatment samples. Results: The median pretreatment tumor diameter was 60 mm (range 25-112 mm). Eighteen out of 32 patients obtained an objective response (OR) to olaparib (56.3%). Somatic or germline mutations affecting homologous recombination (HR) were observed in 10/18 responders [OR 55.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 33.7-75.4] contrasting 1/14 non-responders (OR 7.1%; CI 1.3-31.5, P = 0.008). Among tumors without HR mutations, 6/8 responders versus 3/13 non-responders revealed BRCA1 hypermethylation (P = 0.03). Thus, 16/18 responders (88.9%, CI 67.2-96.9), in contrast to 4/14 non-responders (28.6%, CI 11.7-54.7, P = 0.0008), carried HR mutations and/or BRCA1 methylation. Excluding one gPALB2 and four gBRCA1/2 mutation carriers, 12/14 responders (85.7%, CI 60.1-96.0) versus 3/13 non-responders (23.1%, CI 8.2-50.3, P = 0.002) carried somatic HR mutations and/or BRCA1 methylation. In contrast to BRCAness signature or basal-like subtype, low RAD51 scores, high TIL or high PDL1 expression all correlated to olaparib response. Conclusion: Olaparib yielded a high clinical response rate in treatment-naive TNBCs revealing HR deficiency, beyond germline HR mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据