相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Time to Consider a Personalized Approach to Incorporate Tomosynthesis Into Routine Breast Cancer Screening
Ya-Chen Tina Shih et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2020)
New Federal Requirements to Inform Patients About Breast Density Will They Help Patients?
Nancy L. Keating et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2019)
Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Updated Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Average-Risk Women
Ya-Chen Tina Shih et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2019)
Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes
Nasim Mavaddat et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2019)
Determinants of Mammographic Density Change
Shadi Azam et al.
JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM (2019)
Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer
Stephen W. Duffy et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2018)
Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer A Life-Table Model
Nora Pashayan et al.
JAMA ONCOLOGY (2018)
The impact of legislation mandating breast density notification - Review of the evidence
Nehmat Houssami et al.
BREAST (2018)
Costs and Benefits of Extended Endocrine Strategies for Premenopausal Breast Cancer
Janice S. Kwon et al.
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (2017)
National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
Brian L. Sprague et al.
RADIOLOGY (2017)
Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different US Breast Cancer Screening Strategies
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2016)
Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes
Amy Trentham-Dietz et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2016)
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
Gillian D. Sanders et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2016)
Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness
H. Gilbert Welch et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Comparative Effectiveness of Combined Digital Mammography and Tomosynthesis Screening for Women with Dense Breasts
Christoph I. Lee et al.
RADIOLOGY (2015)
A case-control study to assess the impact of mammographic density on breast cancer risk in women aged 40-49 at intermediate familial risk
Valentina Assi et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2015)
Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for integrating MRI into breast cancer screening for women at high risk
C. H. Ahern et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2014)
Benefits, Harms, and Costs for Breast Cancer Screening After US Implementation of Digital Mammography
Natasha K. Stout et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2014)
Prevalence of Mammographically Dense Breasts in the United States
Brian L. Sprague et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2014)
Cost-Effectiveness and Harm-Benefit Analyses of Risk-Based Screening Strategies for Breast Cancer
Ester Vilaprinyo et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Is full-field digital mammography more accurate than screen-film mammography in overall population screening? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Fabiano H. Souza et al.
BREAST (2013)
Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement
Hatef Darabi et al.
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH (2012)
Projections of the Cost of Cancer Care in the United States: 2010-2020
Angela B. Mariotto et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2011)
Effects of Mammography Screening Under Different Screening Schedules: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2009)
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mammography and Clinical Breast Examination Strategies: A Comparison with Current Guidelines
Charlotte Hsieh Ahern et al.
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2009)
Full-Field Digital versus Screen-Film Mammography: Comparison within the UK Breast Screening Program and Systematic Review of Published Data
Sarah Vinnicombe et al.
RADIOLOGY (2009)
Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival
Stephen W. Duffy et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Issa J. Dahabreh et al.
ONCOLOGIST (2008)
Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging
Sylvia K. Plevritis et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2006)
A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: Mammograms and clinical breast examinations
Y Shen et al.
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2005)
Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer
SE Singletary et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2002)
Representing uncertainty: The role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves
E Fenwick et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2001)
Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: Mammograms and physical examinations
Y Shen et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2001)
One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates
TO Tengs et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2000)