4.6 Article

Centre-periphery approaches based on geography, ecology and historical climate stability: what explains the variation in morphological traits of Bulnesia sarmientoi?

期刊

ANNALS OF BOTANY
卷 127, 期 7, 页码 943-955

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab034

关键词

Centre-periphery hypothesis; Gran Chaco Americano; ecological niche modelling; geographical centre; intraspecific traits; Bulnesia sarmientoi; marginal plant populations; niche centroid; refugium

资金

  1. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria [PNFOR-1104064]
  2. Fondo para la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT-2015-3089, PICTO-2014-0013]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas de Argentina [PIP-11220150100690CO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that there were inconsistent patterns in tree and leaf traits, with the historical approach revealing that trees were shorter in central populations compared to peripheral populations, while significant differences in leaf traits were observed between the geographical center and periphery, mainly due to low specific leaf area values towards the geographical center.
Background and Aims The centre-periphery hypothesis posits that higher species performance is expected in geographic and ecological centres rather than in peripheral populations. However, this is not the commonly found pattern; therefore, alternative approaches, including the historical dimension of species geographical ranges, should be explored. Morphological functional traits are fundamental determinants of species performance, commonly related to environmental stability and productivity. We tested whether or not historical processes may have shaped variations in tree and leaf traits of the Chaco tree Bulnesia sarmientoi. Methods Morphological variation patterns were analysed from three centre-periphery approaches: geographical, ecological and historical. Tree (stem and canopy) and leaf (leaf size and specific leaf area) traits were measured in 24 populations across the species range. A principal component analysis was performed on morphological traits to obtain synthetic variables. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test which of the implemented centre-periphery approaches significantly explained trait spatial patterns. Key Results The patterns retrieved from the three centre-periphery approaches were not concordant. The historical approach revealed that trees were shorter in centre populations than in the periphery. Significant differences in leaf traits were observed between the geographical centre and the periphery, mainly due to low specific leaf area values towards the geographical centre. We did not find any pattern associated with the ecological centre-periphery approach. Conclusions The decoupled response between leaf and tree traits suggests that these sets of traits respond differently to processes occurring at different times. The geographical and historical approaches showed centres with extreme environments in relation to their respective peripheries, but the historical centre has also been a climatically stable area since the Last Glacial Maximum. The historical approach allowed for the recovery of historical processes underlying variation in tree traits, highlighting that centre-periphery delimitations should be based on a multi-approach framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据