4.8 Article

One-step Ethylene Purification from an Acetylene/Ethylene/Ethane Ternary Mixture by Cyclopentadiene Cobalt-Functionalized Metal-Organic Frameworks

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 20, 页码 11350-11358

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202100782

关键词

cobalt; ethylene purification; metal– organic frameworks (MOFs); one-step purification; ternary gas mixture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21875285]
  2. Taishan Scholar Foundation [ts201511019]
  3. Key Research and Development Projects of Shandong Province [2019JZZY010331]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20CX05010A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new modification method using stable ftw topological Zr-MOF platform has been developed to purify ethylene from a mixture of hydrocarbon gases. The introduction of functional groups in UPC-612 and UPC-613 materials has increased host-guest interactions, leading to efficient separation of C2H2/C2H4/C2H6.
The separation of ethylene (C2H4) from a mixture of ethane (C2H6), ethylene (C2H4), and acetylene (C2H2) at normal temperature and pressure is a significant challenge. The sieving effect of pores is powerless due to the similar molecular size and kinetic diameter of these molecules. We report a new modification method based on a stable ftw topological Zr-MOF platform (MOF-525). Introduction of a cyclopentadiene cobalt functional group led to new ftw-type MOFs materials (UPC-612 and UPC-613), which increase the host-guest interaction and achieve efficient ethylene purification from the mixture of hydrocarbon gases. The high performance of UPC-612 and UPC-613 for C2H2/C2H4/C2H6 separation has been verified by gas sorption isotherms, density functional theory (DFT), and experimentally determined breakthrough curves. This work provides a one-step separation of the ternary gas mixture and can further serve as a blueprint for the design and construction of function-oriented porous structures for such applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据