4.8 Article

Potential-Induced Spin Changes in Fe/N/C Electrocatalysts Assessed by In Situ X-ray Emission Spectroscopy

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 21, 页码 11707-11712

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202016951

关键词

electrocatalysts; in situ; Moessbauer spectroscopy; non-resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through the Ambizione Energy [PZENP2_173632]
  2. SNSF [IZK0Z2_157310]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Research and Education
  4. German Research Foundation [03XP0092, KR3980/4-1]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [IZK0Z2_157310, PZENP2_173632] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the electronic structure of molecular sites in two Fe/N/C catalysts by probing their average spin state using X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES), revealing for the first time the existence of reversible, potential-induced spin state changes in these materials.
The commercial success of the electrochemical energy conversion technologies required for the decarbonization of the energy sector requires the replacement of the noble metal-based electrocatalysts currently used in (co-)electrolyzers and fuel cells with inexpensive, platinum-group metal-free analogs. Among these, Fe/N/C-type catalysts display promising performances for the reduction of O-2 or CO2, but their insufficient activity and stability jeopardize their implementation in such devices. To circumvent these issues, a better understanding of the local geometric and electronic structure of their catalytic active sites under reaction conditions is needed. Herein we shed light on the electronic structure of the molecular sites in two Fe/N/C catalysts by probing their average spin state with X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES). Chiefly, our in situ XES measurements reveal for the first time the existence of reversible, potential-induced spin state changes in these materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据