4.8 Article

Harnessing Hypoxia-Dependent Cyanine Photocages for In Vivo Precision Drug Release

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 17, 页码 9553-9561

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202017349

关键词

cyanine; fluorescence imaging; hypoxia-dependent photolysis; near-infrared photocages; photoacoustic imaging

资金

  1. NSFC/China [21788102, 21878087, 21908060]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2018SHZDZX03]
  3. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, the Shuguang Program [18SG27]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M651417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have developed a hypoxia-dependent photoactivation mechanism for precise manipulation of biological events and in vivo feedback regulation. This novel approach overcomes the limitation of oxygen-dependence in current near-infrared photocages, expanding the toolbox for targeted therapy.
Photocaging holds promise for the precise manipulation of biological events in space and time. However, current near-infrared (NIR) photocages are oxygen-dependent for their photolysis and lack of timely feedback regulation, which has proven to be the major bottleneck for targeted therapy. Herein, we present a hypoxia-dependent photo-activation mechanism of dialkylamine-substituted cyanine (Cy-NH) accompanied by emissive fragments generation, which was validated with retrosynthesis and spectral analysis. For the first time, we have realized the orthogonal manipulation of this hypoxia-dependent photocaging and dual-modal optical signals in living cells and tumor-bearing mice, making a breakthrough in the direct spatiotemporal control and in vivo feedback regulation. This unique photoactivation mechanism overcomes the limitation of hypoxia, which allows site-specific remote control for targeted therapy, and expands the photo-trigger toolbox for on-demand drug release, especially in a physiological context with dual-mode optical imaging under hypoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据