4.8 Article

Honeycomb Carbon Nanofibers: A Superhydrophilic O2-Entrapping Electrocatalyst Enables Ultrahigh Mass Activity for the Two-Electron Oxygen Reduction Reaction

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 19, 页码 10583-10587

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202101880

关键词

density functional theory; honeycomb carbon nanofibers; hydrogen peroxide electrosynthesis; O-2 entrapment; superhydrophilicity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22072015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a superhydrophilic O-2-entrapping electrocatalyst for efficient two-electron oxygen reduction, achieving high H2O2 selectivity and ultrahigh mass activity. The catalytic mechanism is further elucidated through in situ Raman analysis and density functional theory calculations.
Electrocatalytic two-electron oxygen reduction has emerged as a promising alternative to the energy- and waste-intensive anthraquinone process for distributed H2O2 production. This process, however, suffers from strong competition from the four-electron pathway leading to low H2O2 selectivity. Herein, we report using a superhydrophilic O-2-entrapping electrocatalyst to enable superb two-electron oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. The honeycomb carbon nanofibers (HCNFs) are robust and capable of achieving a high H2O2 selectivity of 97.3 %, much higher than that of its solid carbon nanofiber counterpart. Impressively, this catalyst achieves an ultrahigh mass activity of up to 220 A g(-1), surpassing all other catalysts for two-electron oxygen reduction reaction. The superhydrophilic porous carbon skeleton with rich oxygenated functional groups facilitates efficient electron transfer and better wetting of the catalyst by the electrolyte, and the interconnected cavities allow for more effective entrapping of the gas bubbles. The catalytic mechanism is further revealed by in situ Raman analysis and density functional theory calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据