4.4 Review

Potential biomarkers for testicular germ cell tumour: Risk assessment, diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring of recurrence

期刊

ANDROLOGIA
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/and.13998

关键词

biomarker; nonseminoma; seminoma; testicular cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) is a relatively rare malignancy that mainly affects young men between the ages of 15 and 35, with genetic and environmental factors contributing to its development. While most patients are diagnosed in early stages with a high survival rate, approximately 25% show incomplete response to chemotherapy or experience tumor relapse. Novel biomarkers such as miRNA-371-3p have shown potential for diagnosis and monitoring of TGCTs.
Testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) is considered a relatively rare malignancy usually occurring in young men between 15 and 35 years of age, and both genetic and environmental factors contribute to its development. The majority of patients are diagnosed in an early-stage of TGCTs with an elevated 5-year survival rate after therapy. However, approximately 25% of patients show an incomplete response to chemotherapy or tumours relapse. The current therapies are accompanied by several adverse effects, including infertility. Aside from classical serum biomarker, many studies reported novel biomarkers for TGCTs, but without proper validation. Cancer cells share many similarities with embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and since ESC genes are not transcribed in most adult tissues, they could be considered ideal candidate targets for cancer-specific diagnosis and treatment. Added to this, several microRNAs (miRNA) including miRNA-371-3p can be further investigated as a molecular biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of TGCTs. In this review, we will illustrate the findings of recent investigations in novel TGCTs biomarkers applicable for risk assessment, screening, diagnosis, prognosis, prediction and monitoring of the relapse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据