4.8 Article

Intelligent Multidimensional Purity Analysis and Confirmation Tool for Multiple Attribute Analysis

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 8, 页码 3905-3913

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04652

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC Canada
  2. Eli Lilly Research Assistance Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chiral active pharmaceutical ingredients have better binding specificity to chiral biological targets than achiral ones, but synthesizing them requires optimizing multiple quality attributes simultaneously. The multidimensional liquid chromatographic tool allows for the measurement of multiple attributes from a single injection, aiding scientists in identifying unknown impurities accurately.
Chiral active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are known to bind to chiral biological targets with better on-target specificity than achiral ones. However, the methods of synthesizing such APIs stereoselectively require the exhaustive optimization of multiple quality attributes of an asymmetric synthesis, wherein all critical quality attributes (for example, chemical and stereochemical purity of the API) are to be optimized in parallel and ideally from the beginning of the drug development program. A multidimensional liquid chromatographic tool capable of simultaneously measuring multiple quality attributes from a single analytical injection is reported. The tool is designed for the recirculation of chromatographic eluent bearing an analyte of interest through one or more stationary phases using a new and uniquely designed heart-cut valve. The iterative measurement of a target analyte from just one single injection will help scientists identify whether an unknown impurity is formed during reaction or during analysis. This chromatographic tool is particularly useful in the discovery of on-analysis artifacts, which is a resource-intensive exercise involving the identification, synthesis, and injection of impurity standards, all of which delay the drug development program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据